Available 24/7 · Hablamos español · We help everyone regardless of immigration status · $500 million+ recovered · No fee unless we win.
*Prior results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case depends on its own facts.
Injured on a New York construction site? Oresky & Associates represents workers hurt in scaffold falls, ladder accidents, falling-object injuries, trench collapses, and other serious construction accidents across NYC. Hablamos Español.
A New York construction accident case may exist when a worker is injured because of a scaffold fall, ladder accident, falling object, trench collapse, defective equipment, or unsafe job-site condition. In many cases, Labor Law § 240 and § 241(6) provide rights beyond workers’ compensation. Free consultation in English or Spanish: (718) 993-9999.
Trusted by Injured New Yorkers and Their Families
Oresky and Associates has earned the trust of hundreds of injured workers and families across New York City. We are local, we live in the Bronx and Queens, and we represent our neighbors. Read what people just like you say about their experience with us.
What is a New York Construction Accident Case?
Construction sites are among the most dangerous workplaces in New York. Workers can suffer life-changing injuries from scaffold falls, falling tools and debris, trench collapses, unsafe ladders, electrocutions, and defective safety equipment.
In many situations, injured workers may have rights beyond workers’ compensation under New York Labor Law § 240 and § 241(6).
Who Can Be Held Responsible
Owners and General Contractors
New York law places significant responsibility on property owners and general contractors to maintain safe construction sites. Under New York Labor Law § 240, owners and contractors may be held liable when required safety equipment — such as scaffolds, guardrails, harnesses, hoists, and lifelines — is missing, defective, or improperly secured. Liability may also arise under Labor Law § 241(6) when specific New York Industrial Code safety regulations are violated on a construction site.
Third Parties and Equipment Manufacturers
Construction accident claims may also involve subcontractors, equipment manufacturers, scaffold companies, crane operators, maintenance providers, and other third parties whose negligence contributed to the accident. While workers’ compensation generally prevents lawsuits against a direct employer, it does not prevent injured workers from pursuing claims against responsible third parties. Depending on the circumstances, multiple companies or entities may share liability for a construction injury. Key New York case law: Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co., 81 N.Y.2d 494 (1993); Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co., 78 N.Y.2d 509 (1991); Blake v Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, 1 N.Y.3d 280 (2003).
Common Questions About Construction Accidents
- How do I know if I have a New York construction accident case?
- What is the difference between workers’ compensation, Labor Law § 240, and Labor Law § 241(6)?
- Does my immigration status affect my New York construction accident claim?
- How does a contingency fee work for a New York construction accident lawyer?
- What deadlines apply after a New York construction accident — workers’ compensation, lawsuit, and Notice of Claim?
Labor Law 240 vs Labor Law 241(6)
Construction accident cases often involve both statutes. They work together but apply differently. Labor Law § 240 protects against elevation-related risks — falls and falling objects — and imposes absolute liability when prescribed safety devices fail. Labor Law § 241(6) protects against a broader range of construction hazards but requires the injured worker to identify a specific violation of the New York Industrial Code (12 NYCRR Part 23). Comparative fault may reduce a 241(6) recovery; it does not reduce a 240 recovery. A New York construction case may proceed under both statutes simultaneously. For the full statutory breakdown and case law (Ross, Rocovich, Blake), see our Labor Law 240 hub.
| Element | Labor Law § 240 (Scaffold Law) | Labor Law § 241(6) |
|---|---|---|
| Triggering hazard | Elevation-related (falls, falling objects) | Construction, demolition, excavation generally |
| Liability standard | Absolute, non-delegable | Negligence tied to specific Industrial Code violation |
| Required showing | Prescribed safety device missing or failed | Specific NY Industrial Code Rule 23 violation caused injury |
| Defenses available | Very limited (sole proximate cause only) | Comparative fault may reduce recovery |
| Typical scenarios | Scaffold fall, ladder fall, falling object | Trench collapse, slip/trip on debris, unsafe walkway |


