Jacob Oresky

Jacob Oresky is a New York City personal injury attorney admitted to the New York State Bar and to the U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. He has represented injured construction workers and accident victims in serious and catastrophic injury cases throughout the city.

View Bio

Available 24/7 · Hablamos español · We help everyone regardless of immigration status · $500 million+ recovered · No fee unless we win.

*Prior results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case depends on its own facts.

Injured on a New York construction site? Oresky & Associates represents workers hurt in scaffold falls, ladder accidents, falling-object injuries, trench collapses, and other serious construction accidents across NYC. Hablamos Español.

A New York construction accident case may exist when a worker is injured because of a scaffold fall, ladder accident, falling object, trench collapse, defective equipment, or unsafe job-site condition. In many cases, Labor Law § 240 and § 241(6) provide rights beyond workers’ compensation. Free consultation in English or Spanish: (718) 993-9999.

Trusted by Injured New Yorkers and Their Families

Oresky and Associates has earned the trust of hundreds of injured workers and families across New York City. We are local, we live in the Bronx and Queens, and we represent our neighbors. Read what people just like you say about their experience with us.

What is a New York Construction Accident Case?

Construction sites are among the most dangerous workplaces in New York. Workers can suffer life-changing injuries from scaffold falls, falling tools and debris, trench collapses, unsafe ladders, electrocutions, and defective safety equipment.

In many situations, injured workers may have rights beyond workers’ compensation under New York Labor Law § 240 and § 241(6).

Who Can Be Held Responsible

Owners and General Contractors

New York law places significant responsibility on property owners and general contractors to maintain safe construction sites. Under New York Labor Law § 240, owners and contractors may be held liable when required safety equipment — such as scaffolds, guardrails, harnesses, hoists, and lifelines — is missing, defective, or improperly secured. Liability may also arise under Labor Law § 241(6) when specific New York Industrial Code safety regulations are violated on a construction site.

Third Parties and Equipment Manufacturers

Construction accident claims may also involve subcontractors, equipment manufacturers, scaffold companies, crane operators, maintenance providers, and other third parties whose negligence contributed to the accident. While workers’ compensation generally prevents lawsuits against a direct employer, it does not prevent injured workers from pursuing claims against responsible third parties. Depending on the circumstances, multiple companies or entities may share liability for a construction injury. Key New York case law: Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co., 81 N.Y.2d 494 (1993); Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co., 78 N.Y.2d 509 (1991); Blake v Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, 1 N.Y.3d 280 (2003).

Labor Law 240 vs Labor Law 241(6)

Construction accident cases often involve both statutes. They work together but apply differently. Labor Law § 240 protects against elevation-related risks — falls and falling objects — and imposes absolute liability when prescribed safety devices fail. Labor Law § 241(6) protects against a broader range of construction hazards but requires the injured worker to identify a specific violation of the New York Industrial Code (12 NYCRR Part 23). Comparative fault may reduce a 241(6) recovery; it does not reduce a 240 recovery. A New York construction case may proceed under both statutes simultaneously. For the full statutory breakdown and case law (Ross, Rocovich, Blake), see our Labor Law 240 hub.

ElementLabor Law § 240 (Scaffold Law)Labor Law § 241(6)
Triggering hazardElevation-related (falls, falling objects)Construction, demolition, excavation generally
Liability standardAbsolute, non-delegableNegligence tied to specific Industrial Code violation
Required showingPrescribed safety device missing or failedSpecific NY Industrial Code Rule 23 violation caused injury
Defenses availableVery limited (sole proximate cause only)Comparative fault may reduce recovery
Typical scenariosScaffold fall, ladder fall, falling objectTrench collapse, slip/trip on debris, unsafe walkway